The Outer Worlds 2 ha salido bueno

Yemeth

imagen

Metacritic: 85
Opencritic: 80

The Outer Worlds 2 is a confidently made game. It is perfectly scoped, with excellent gameplay, writing, and voice acting. The combat and movement are the biggest step up over the original. Whether you have played that title or not, if you want a choice-heavy, narrative-rich adventure in a far-off solar system, then this game is worth a download or Game Pass or buying outright.

Inverse (9/10):

The sequel utterly revels in the absurdity of its satire on capitalism, government, authoritarianism, and individuality – even if it takes a bit longer to get situated than the first game.

Noisy Pixel (9/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is a confident and evolved sequel that deepens Obsidian's signature blend of player agency, narrative impact, and dark satire. Set in a galaxy divided by ideology and shaped by choice, it refines nearly every system from its predecessor while introducing dynamic flaws, factional politics, and layered exploration that rewards curiosity. Though some visuals and early customization options fall short, its storytelling, companion design, and flexible mission structure shine across dozens of hours.

Playstation Universe (9/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 excels on almost all fronts, presenting you with an open RPG that lets you choose how you progress while still keeping you on a clear path. The in-game systems allow you to customize how you play and give you versatility in the choices you make along the way. Combine that with great writing, and you have a recipe for success. Equipment menus are a bit clunky, enemy encounters can be manipulated, and the act of looting takes some getting used to. Still, none of these issues will keep you from enjoying the game. The Outers Worlds 2 is worth every penny of the $70 it asks for.

Loot Level Chill (9/10):

I loved my time with The Outer Worlds 2 and will go back for at least a second run with different choices and skills. It's a deceptively smart Looter-shooter RPG with colourful worlds and entertaining characters, and some really satisfying, malleable combat. The skill, dialogue, and progression systems are more than enough to make up for some iffy performance and a couple of (hopefully patchable) design decisions, and it reinforces my belief that Obsidian is one of the greats.

Metro UK (9/10):

A deep, funny, and systemically complex role-playing game, built around wry satire and a far-reaching sense of consequence, where conversation is at least as important as combat.

COGConnected (85/100):

There are few ways in which The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't improve on the first game. It's bigger, deeper, and more complex. The story and characters are more satisfying. Combat has been refined. It takes its time and demands players be patient and engage in all its systems and overlook some technical issues that pop up somewhat frequently. I can't imagine a world -- Outer or not -- in which fans of the original won't enjoy this new experience.

wccftech (8.5/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is an improved, more refined version of The Outer Worlds and is an all-around better game than its predecessor, with a well-executed Flaw system to keep gameplay interesting, improved gunplay, stunning visuals, and excellent character writing, voice acting and animations. It's held back by a lacking plot that fizzles well before the end, progression pacing that's all over the place, and an abysmal menu system, but those elements don't make it a game you should skip, whether you were a fan of the first game or not.

PCGamer (83/100):

The Outer Worlds 2 is not a new Obsidian all-timer, but it's one of the best games I've played this year and an RPG I'll happily revisit down the line. Some of its balance and mechanical quirks can be frustrating, particularly early in a playthrough, but enduring them is well worth it.

IGN (8/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't try to rewrite Obsidian's RPG playbook, but it's yet another strong refinement, with smoother combat, diabolically compelling buildcrafting and loot, and a story that immediately made me want to start again to see an alternate outcome. The sluggish first act and lack of enemy variety make it a bit of a slog at certain times, but once its story of political intrigue kicks in and the new flaws and perks system gets its claws in you, it can be quite hard to put down. All these improvements put The Outer Worlds 2 that much closer to being the Fallout: New Vegas successor we hoped this series would be, and that's worth getting excited about.

GameSpot (8/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 imbues Obsidian's spacefaring RPG series with its own identity, letting you bumble your way through corporate and cultish intrigue in space.

Progress Bar (8/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is a great sequel. Core aspects have been vastly improved upon, from the delightful skill and flaws system, to the feel and flow of combat, to the wacky visuals. That said, it hasn't quite managed to shake off all the problems of the first game. The humour and somewhat shallow nature of a lot of this world's satire gets grating pretty fast. The factions and their many members are far too often cartoonish and goofy, which doesn't always make for compelling storytelling. Despite this, The Outer Worlds 2 remains a bold step in the right direction and a title well worth checking out if you're a fan of Obsidian's work.

Eurogamer (8/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is for better and worse still fluffy gaming comfort food, but it is significantly improved and better than its predecessor in almost every way.

Worth Playing (8/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is a solid, engaging and enjoyable follow-up to the original game. It changes its dynamic and tone enough that it can potentially turn off people who really loved the original. At the same time, it feels like something that might work better for those who prefer their RPGs to be less goofy. There's a varied and interesting set of character builds available, and it's easy to imagine playing the game multiple times to see distinctly different outcomes for various quests. If you're looking for a solid RPG with some good meat on its bones, The Outer Worlds 2 does everything it needs to do.

Techraptor (7.5/10):

While there's little wrong with The Outer Worlds 2, it doesn't have a pull that will keep players wanting to devote hours to it.

TheSixthAxis (7/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 is a thoroughly enjoyable game, but as sequels go, it's largely more of the same. While the overarching story isn't terribly interesting, the world building around it and the colony of Arcadia is great to explore. What's disappointing is a lack of improvement in too many areas. It looks better and gunplay is better, but old snags and weaknesses from the first game remain and, more importantly, it's not as exciting and new as it was the first time round.

PushSquare (7/10):

The Outer Worlds 2 succeeds in being a bigger and better sequel, buoyed by an even greater emphasis on player choice and freedom. Its RPG mechanics are largely fantastic, and there are key improvements to both combat and exploration.

However, despite Obsidian's clever writing, there's a underlying dreariness to the property that it just can't seem to escape. These dull characters and their one-note factions are difficult to truly care for.

Final Weapon (3.5/5):

The Outer Worlds 2 is a fantastic modern RPG. The emphasis on player choice and customization, the great dialogue and characters, exceptional worldbuilding, and fun gameplay mechanics make it one of Obsidian's best games in years. However, that excitement is hindered by frustrating navigation mechanics, constant glitches, and characters that lack depth due to the absence of romances and natural speech options. While this is a great return to form for the genre, you may be better off waiting for all of the issues to be fixed in a post-launch update before buying.

Dexerto (3/5):

After waiting six years for another crack at The Outer Worlds, it feels disappointing to be met with a sequel that is so promising but marred by a poor first half and frustrating Flaws. But the game isn't a total flop, saved by its whimsical charm, vivid dystopian subject matter, and the classic, slower, and more explorative design that Obsidian games have perfected.

VGC (3/5):

As a sequel, The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't strive to reinvent its past foundation and does little to stand out in the RPG genre. If you're looking for new toys to play with, you'll find plenty of weapons and a much-improved gunplay to boot. Just don't expect to carry many memories of your time in Arcadia with you.

CNET (Unscored):

The Outer Worlds 2 is one of my favorite RPGs released this year, and it's so close to greatness. It has practically everything I wanted in a game (enough that I could have considered it even better than Mass Effect), but Obsidian just missed the mark with its tone. Who knows, maybe the company will figure it out with the third game in the series.

Rockpapershotgun (Unscored):

If you float into Arcadia expecting something as deeply crafted and eminently memorable as New Vegas, or even Obsidian's medieval murder mystery Pentiment, I'd say the experience falls short of those very lofty marks. Or, as The Outer Worlds 2 seems to think my advertising-addled brain would put it: me like Other Words too, but no new New Vargas.

Polygon (Unscored):

The Outer Worlds 2 is defined by its whiplash, alternating between deeply rewarding storytelling and outcomes that feel rushed and stilted. I largely enjoyed the time I spent (mostly) making Arcadia a better place; it's just disappointing to see such strong potential in the opening hours that doesn't show up again. There's a middle ground between the first game's brevity and the sequel's overly ambitious nature, and I hope Obsidian gets the chance to find it in a third game.

https://as.com/meristation/analisis/analisis-de-the-outer-worlds-2-un-rpg-de-ciencia-ficcion-ideal-para-sibaritas-del-genero-f202510-n/

imagen

https://vandal.elespanol.com/analisis/pc/the-outer-worlds-2/102232#p-13

imagen

https://www.eurogamer.es/the-outer-worlds-2-analisis-review

https://www.hobbyconsolas.com/reviews/analisis-outer-worlds-2-viaje-espacial-puro-obsidian-1487827

imagen

chus32

No he jugado la primera parte pero quizá pruebe este cuando lo vea medio barato.

Vargstein

No lo dudaba a pesar de los odiadores

Serizawa

Lo visto de este me mola más que el anterior

Yemeth

Cuando se habla de Obsidian es obligatorio nombrar New Vegas.

Berti

Sumadle 0,5 a la nota final que le habrán quitado por ser de Obsidian

domyos90

Por lo que sea a este sí le toca criticar gráficamente por no ser lo más de lo más, pero al Polemon con gráficos de hace 15 años, bugs y un rendimiento extremadamente pobre, no.

La casualidad

Berti

domyos90 A mí me parece un poco de aquella manera quejarse de los gráficos de un juego que se ve como este

Tharitley

En general parece que han mejorado en todo con respecto al primero. Lo que más he notado es el combate, que parece ya de un juego de su categoría, no la cutrez sosa que hicieron en el primero.

No tenía claro si lo compraría de salida, pero me estoy picando un poco 🤔

irakmata

PAL

irakmata

Como para fiarse de los análisis de la prensa.

Con lo sencillo que es siendo una secuela: ¿me gustó el primero? Sí, pues compraré el segundo también, que salvo hecatombe (como lo que mencionáis de Fallout 76) que no pasaría desapercibida lo normal es que sea mejor que el primero.

Xyro

Parece que no es que sea mucho mejor que el anterior, y me pareció bastante malo, así que interés ninguno

AgumonDX

Obsidian es lo mejor que tiene Microsoft, espero que no los cierren.

GameOver

Obsidian deberia aspirar a ser algo más que un eterno notable toda la vida. Pero si MS no suelta la mosca no se puede hacer nada.

Intolerable

GameOver

Pentiment 86
Pillars 88 y 89
Avowed 80
Fallout NV 84
The outer Worlds 85 y 84
South Park 85
Tyranny 80
Kotor 2 86
Alpha Protocol 63
Neverwinder 2 82

Incluso con sus juegos más laureados históricos se quedan entre los 80/89, dudo que realmente el problema que tengan sea que MS les hace nada, más bien parece que el tipo de juegos que hacen no son imanes de notas y van cuesta arriba, cuesta que se lleve un juego de los que hacen mas nota, se la merezcan o no. Les falta camara 3a persona, y un señor mayor con barba llorando porque se le ha muerto el hijo mientras suena música de pena y graficazos. Y llamarse Bethesda o Bioware.

Estan las excepciones como BG3, pero esas son las menos.

whocares

Notas parecidas o inclso peores que las del Dragon Age: The Gaysomethingsomething. Seguro que será un mierdón

Berti

whocares Son notas que sólo han tenido exclusivamente este y Dragon Age Veilguard

Tharitley

Intolerable

Claro, como que a Bethesda y Bioware se las perdonan todas 😆

PD: Este juego sí tiene cámara en tercera persona, aunque da bastante cáncer jugar así.

Marquez

Tharitley cuando hacían las cosas bien, la gente los trataba bien.

Bethesda no ha hecho nunca nada bien.

Intolerable el pillars 2 es una maravilla. Vaya injusticia sus notas y sus ventas.

nestore93

Intolerable Alpha Protocol 63

Joder como se la pegó este para la prensa, con lo que me gustó.

Vaya juegardo, ojalá una secuela.

Intolerable

Tharitley Claro, como que a Bethesda y Bioware se las perdonan todas 😆

Ahora ya no se les perdona, porque AHORA no son vaca sagrada.

Durante una época se les perdonaban cosas, ahora ya está aceptado que dan cosica, pero ya me dirás qué sentido tiene que esta gente saque secuelas mejores de ambas compañías y todas las secuelas tengan como 10 puntos menos en metacritic xd, tiene fallout 3 93 de media. O puede que no se les perdonase nada y como tenian renombre se les analizaba en serio, mientras que la siguiente entrega echa por unos don nadies ya pues le ponemos un ochito con dos porque no hay que preocuparse de que nos manden el presskit del siguiente juego.

Morde

SONY

Tharitley

Intolerable

Según lo veo yo, cuando hacían las cosas bien, la gente los trataba bien. Cuando comenzaron a hacer las cosas mal, la gente los trató mal. ¿Dónde encuentras el problema en esta cronología? Lo absurdo sería que hicieran las cosas mal y los trataran bien o que hicieran las cosas perfectamente y los trataran como la mierda.

Pero ahora mismo Bethesda y Bioware son sacos de boxeo, como Ubisoft, EA o Square Enix... vamos, la gente no les regala ni perdona nada. Si quieres mencionar ejemplos de compañías endiosadas a las que se les perdona todo pon a Nintendo o a FromSoftware, incluso a CD Projekt porque aunque el lanzamiento de Cyberpunk fue un desastre, parece que ya todo está perdonado y el hype por sus siguientes juegos está más alto que nunca.

whocares

Tharitley Pero si el nuevo Dragon Age se llevó notazas, a pesar de parecer estar escrito por usuarios de r/fauxmoi y blue sky....

Intolerable

Tharitley Según lo veo yo, cuando hacían las cosas bien, la gente los trataba bien. Cuando comenzaron a hacer las cosas mal, la gente los trató mal. ¿Dónde encuentras el problema en esta cronología? Lo absurdo sería que hicieran las cosas mal y los trataran bien o que hicieran las cosas perfectamente y los trataran como la mierda.

Tiene más nota FO4 que FONV que es uno de los mejores RPGS ~~modernos~~ de su época que existen, o como mínimo, mejor en practicamente todo que define a la saga y a un RPG que FO3 y FO4, y como digo, tiene menos nota. De hecho, dices que "ahora les tratan mal porque hacen las cosas mal" y tiene la misma nota en MC Starfield que FONV. Me da que o a una no se le reconoce lo bien que lo hace, o bien a la otra se le siguen perdonando cosas, pero menos, porque ya no son la vaca sagrada que era antes.

Puede que ambas cosas.

Página siguiente »