Metacritic: 85 Opencritic: 80 XboxEra (9/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is a confidently made game. It is perfectly scoped, with excellent gameplay, writing, and voice acting. The combat and movement are the biggest step up over the original. Whether you have played that title or not, if you want a choice-heavy, narrative-rich adventure in a far-off solar system, then this game is worth a download or Game Pass or buying outright. Inverse (9/10): The sequel utterly revels in the absurdity of its satire on capitalism, government, authoritarianism, and individuality – even if it takes a bit longer to get situated than the first game. Noisy Pixel (9/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is a confident and evolved sequel that deepens Obsidian's signature blend of player agency, narrative impact, and dark satire. Set in a galaxy divided by ideology and shaped by choice, it refines nearly every system from its predecessor while introducing dynamic flaws, factional politics, and layered exploration that rewards curiosity. Though some visuals and early customization options fall short, its storytelling, companion design, and flexible mission structure shine across dozens of hours. Playstation Universe (9/10): The Outer Worlds 2 excels on almost all fronts, presenting you with an open RPG that lets you choose how you progress while still keeping you on a clear path. The in-game systems allow you to customize how you play and give you versatility in the choices you make along the way. Combine that with great writing, and you have a recipe for success. Equipment menus are a bit clunky, enemy encounters can be manipulated, and the act of looting takes some getting used to. Still, none of these issues will keep you from enjoying the game. The Outers Worlds 2 is worth every penny of the $70 it asks for. Loot Level Chill (9/10): I loved my time with The Outer Worlds 2 and will go back for at least a second run with different choices and skills. It's a deceptively smart Looter-shooter RPG with colourful worlds and entertaining characters, and some really satisfying, malleable combat. The skill, dialogue, and progression systems are more than enough to make up for some iffy performance and a couple of (hopefully patchable) design decisions, and it reinforces my belief that Obsidian is one of the greats. Metro UK (9/10): A deep, funny, and systemically complex role-playing game, built around wry satire and a far-reaching sense of consequence, where conversation is at least as important as combat. COGConnected (85/100): There are few ways in which The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't improve on the first game. It's bigger, deeper, and more complex. The story and characters are more satisfying. Combat has been refined. It takes its time and demands players be patient and engage in all its systems and overlook some technical issues that pop up somewhat frequently. I can't imagine a world -- Outer or not -- in which fans of the original won't enjoy this new experience. wccftech (8.5/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is an improved, more refined version of The Outer Worlds and is an all-around better game than its predecessor, with a well-executed Flaw system to keep gameplay interesting, improved gunplay, stunning visuals, and excellent character writing, voice acting and animations. It's held back by a lacking plot that fizzles well before the end, progression pacing that's all over the place, and an abysmal menu system, but those elements don't make it a game you should skip, whether you were a fan of the first game or not. PCGamer (83/100): The Outer Worlds 2 is not a new Obsidian all-timer, but it's one of the best games I've played this year and an RPG I'll happily revisit down the line. Some of its balance and mechanical quirks can be frustrating, particularly early in a playthrough, but enduring them is well worth it. IGN (8/10): The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't try to rewrite Obsidian's RPG playbook, but it's yet another strong refinement, with smoother combat, diabolically compelling buildcrafting and loot, and a story that immediately made me want to start again to see an alternate outcome. The sluggish first act and lack of enemy variety make it a bit of a slog at certain times, but once its story of political intrigue kicks in and the new flaws and perks system gets its claws in you, it can be quite hard to put down. All these improvements put The Outer Worlds 2 that much closer to being the Fallout: New Vegas successor we hoped this series would be, and that's worth getting excited about. GameSpot (8/10): The Outer Worlds 2 imbues Obsidian's spacefaring RPG series with its own identity, letting you bumble your way through corporate and cultish intrigue in space. Progress Bar (8/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is a great sequel. Core aspects have been vastly improved upon, from the delightful skill and flaws system, to the feel and flow of combat, to the wacky visuals. That said, it hasn't quite managed to shake off all the problems of the first game. The humour and somewhat shallow nature of a lot of this world's satire gets grating pretty fast. The factions and their many members are far too often cartoonish and goofy, which doesn't always make for compelling storytelling. Despite this, The Outer Worlds 2 remains a bold step in the right direction and a title well worth checking out if you're a fan of Obsidian's work. Eurogamer (8/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is for better and worse still fluffy gaming comfort food, but it is significantly improved and better than its predecessor in almost every way. Worth Playing (8/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is a solid, engaging and enjoyable follow-up to the original game. It changes its dynamic and tone enough that it can potentially turn off people who really loved the original. At the same time, it feels like something that might work better for those who prefer their RPGs to be less goofy. There's a varied and interesting set of character builds available, and it's easy to imagine playing the game multiple times to see distinctly different outcomes for various quests. If you're looking for a solid RPG with some good meat on its bones, The Outer Worlds 2 does everything it needs to do. Techraptor (7.5/10) : While there's little wrong with The Outer Worlds 2, it doesn't have a pull that will keep players wanting to devote hours to it. TheSixthAxis (7/10): The Outer Worlds 2 is a thoroughly enjoyable game, but as sequels go, it's largely more of the same. While the overarching story isn't terribly interesting, the world building around it and the colony of Arcadia is great to explore. What's disappointing is a lack of improvement in too many areas. It looks better and gunplay is better, but old snags and weaknesses from the first game remain and, more importantly, it's not as exciting and new as it was the first time round. PushSquare (7/10): The Outer Worlds 2 succeeds in being a bigger and better sequel, buoyed by an even greater emphasis on player choice and freedom. Its RPG mechanics are largely fantastic, and there are key improvements to both combat and exploration. However, despite Obsidian's clever writing, there's a underlying dreariness to the property that it just can't seem to escape. These dull characters and their one-note factions are difficult to truly care for. Final Weapon (3.5/5): The Outer Worlds 2 is a fantastic modern RPG. The emphasis on player choice and customization, the great dialogue and characters, exceptional worldbuilding, and fun gameplay mechanics make it one of Obsidian's best games in years. However, that excitement is hindered by frustrating navigation mechanics, constant glitches, and characters that lack depth due to the absence of romances and natural speech options. While this is a great return to form for the genre, you may be better off waiting for all of the issues to be fixed in a post-launch update before buying. Dexerto (3/5): After waiting six years for another crack at The Outer Worlds, it feels disappointing to be met with a sequel that is so promising but marred by a poor first half and frustrating Flaws. But the game isn't a total flop, saved by its whimsical charm, vivid dystopian subject matter, and the classic, slower, and more explorative design that Obsidian games have perfected. VGC (3/5): As a sequel, The Outer Worlds 2 doesn't strive to reinvent its past foundation and does little to stand out in the RPG genre. If you're looking for new toys to play with, you'll find plenty of weapons and a much-improved gunplay to boot. Just don't expect to carry many memories of your time in Arcadia with you. CNET (Unscored): The Outer Worlds 2 is one of my favorite RPGs released this year, and it's so close to greatness. It has practically everything I wanted in a game (enough that I could have considered it even better than Mass Effect), but Obsidian just missed the mark with its tone. Who knows, maybe the company will figure it out with the third game in the series. Rockpapershotgun (Unscored): If you float into Arcadia expecting something as deeply crafted and eminently memorable as New Vegas, or even Obsidian's medieval murder mystery Pentiment, I'd say the experience falls short of those very lofty marks. Or, as The Outer Worlds 2 seems to think my advertising-addled brain would put it: me like Other Words too, but no new New Vargas. Polygon (Unscored): The Outer Worlds 2 is defined by its whiplash, alternating between deeply rewarding storytelling and outcomes that feel rushed and stilted. I largely enjoyed the time I spent (mostly) making Arcadia a better place; it's just disappointing to see such strong potential in the opening hours that doesn't show up again. There's a middle ground between the first game's brevity and the sequel's overly ambitious nature, and I hope Obsidian gets the chance to find it in a third game. https://as.com/meristation/analisis/analisis-de-the-outer-worlds-2-un-rpg-de-ciencia-ficcion-ideal-para-sibaritas-del-genero-f202510-n/ 8 https://vandal.elespanol.com/analisis/pc/the-outer-worlds-2/102232#p-13 https://www.eurogamer.es/the-outer-worlds-2-analisis-review https://www.hobbyconsolas.com/reviews/analisis-outer-worlds-2-viaje-espacial-puro-obsidian-1487827

No he jugado la primera parte pero quizá pruebe este cuando lo vea medio barato.

No lo dudaba a pesar de los odiadores

Lo visto de este me mola más que el anterior

Cuando se habla de Obsidian es obligatorio nombrar New Vegas.

Sumadle 0,5 a la nota final que le habrán quitado por ser de Obsidian

Por lo que sea a este sí le toca criticar gráficamente por no ser lo más de lo más, pero al Polemon con gráficos de hace 15 años, bugs y un rendimiento extremadamente pobre, no. La casualidad

domyos90 A mí me parece un poco de aquella manera quejarse de los gráficos de un juego que se ve como este

En general parece que han mejorado en todo con respecto al primero. Lo que más he notado es el combate, que parece ya de un juego de su categoría, no la cutrez sosa que hicieron en el primero. No tenía claro si lo compraría de salida, pero me estoy picando un poco 🤔

Parece que no es que sea mucho mejor que el anterior, y me pareció bastante malo, así que interés ninguno

The Outer Worlds 2 ha salido bueno

TheElf

Marquez el pillars 2 es una maravilla. Vaya injusticia sus notas y sus ventas.

El trato a Tyranny otra injusticia, me cago en todas las notas que ha puesto @Intolerable

Berti

Nullpointerexception Qué?

Nullpointerexception

Berti Supongo que el primer Outer Worlds no ahce falta jugarlo antes

Berti

Nullpointerexception Osea que me estoy jugando yo los Wasteland, para llegar a Fallout New Vegas y de ahí The Outer Worlds 1 y 2 y me vienes tú con esas.

Nullpointerexception

Berti Yo siempre adelanto por la derecha

Ventalto

Berti ha estado 5 dias de acceso anticipado, el lanzamiento real fue ayer (un miercoles) donde alcanzó 13k. Es complicado de medir por eso, yo diría que lanzamiento correctito a lo sumo, para las expectativas de MS yo diría que se va a quedar bastante lejos.

Berti

Ventalto
Y lo querían colar a 80euros, recordemos. Pobre Obsidian siempre remando, me da a mí que si no fuera por Grounded estaban chapadísimos

goyo1one

70 euros, voces en inglés 💀

whocares

Pero es que siempre van a contracorriente. No es ningún misterio que la tendencia es meter personajes interesantes que te puedas tirar y te salen autenticas aberraciones con las personalidades más insípidas posibles. Dentro de tus compañeros no puede faltar el POC que es un puto genio de ingeniería o la girlboss macarra. Esto podría haber estado bien hace una década. Pero ahora se sienten como un check más en la lista de la corrección política. Quiero decir, Cyberpunk salió hace un lustro y tiene personajes mucho más estimulantes y profundos

Si el mayor argumento contra el romance es que el factor te inhibe a la hora de crearlos porque tienen que ser perfectos para que sean romanceables, la verdad es que tampoco son muy emocionantes

Los diálogos tampoco están muy allá. No veo esa supuesta densidad en las alternativas del roleo. No veo personajes que parezcan individuos reales. No es un círculo massefectiano, pero vaya, las alternativas tampoco me dicen mucho

Todo lo demás está muy bien o no tanto. Yo diría que sí está más o menos bien. El gunplay es excelente, me parece. Y tiene mecánicas muy buenas, pero no es agradable o interesante

Marquez

whocares ¿en este tampoco hay romances?. Vaya panda de subnomales.

Berti

Por qué a la gente le interesa tantísimo los romances, pregunta de novato del género? Entiendo que molan, en los juegos de Bioware siempre vi su gracia, pero no entiendo el hate que cae a un juego cuando no los tiene

Yemeth

Berti Pregúntate que pasaría con la saga Persona si quitaran el simulador de waifu.

domyos90

Berti Por qué a la gente le interesa tantísimo los romances

Para una vez que ligamos, no nos quites la ilusión

Milipu

Berti Por qué a la gente le interesa tantísimo los romances, pregunta de novato del género? Entiendo que molan, en los juegos de Bioware siempre vi su gracia, pero no entiendo el hate que cae a un juego cuando no los tiene

A mí es algo que realmente me sobra. Si lo ponen pues a quién le interese pues vale, pero a mí me da igual.

Berti

Yemeth Es que más de la mitad de Persona son relaciones sociales, no es lo mismo xD Y aún con esas los romances en sí son una castaña.

Berti

domyos90 Pero si son todas lesbianas con el pelo corto y dd colores

yavanna

Hasta los cojones me tiene con tanto cuelgue, se me queda pillado en alguna pantalla de carga, me deja jodido el pc, y tengo que recargar una partida más antigua.

Artyom

Yo lo he estado jugando en gamepass. Es cierto que mejora lo anterior en algunos aspectos. Y es cierto que sigue siendo Outer Worlds para otra serie de cosas malas que vienen de la primera parte. Para los que venimos curtidos de jugar a juegos del mismo género, esto simplemente no aporta nada nuevo. Es un juego normalito que encima tiene un rendimiento mediocre para lo que ofrece visualmente.

P.D. Como comentario extra otro juego más donde la dificultad más alta = enemigos esponjas de balas que te matan con mirarte, dificultad que se ve que no se han pasado los desarrolladores y simplemente se han limitado a ponerle a todo un multiplicador.

Marquez

Berti cada juego de Obsidian lo hace peor que el anterior en números.

Cuando la cierren y la gente se indigne que recuerden que deberían de haber comprado sus juegos antes. Como con Arkane que de repente a todo el mundo le gustaban sus juegos pero nunca los habían comprado.

Berti

Marquez
No sé que solución tiene, ¿quizá sus juegos no convencen ni a los "casual" ni a los que buscan un buen rpg? Lo mismo tiene que hacer algo más duro y no quedarse en tierra de nadie...ni puta idea.

PAL

Marquez

No sé el efecto de GamePass pero es más grave porque Steam está hoy mucho más extendido que hace unos años.

El tema con ellos y con Arkane es que tampoco puedes decir "se lo merecen" viendo la calidad de sus juegos. A veces es cosa del género, como creo que pasa con Arkane, pero es que Larian lo petó con Original Sin 2 y Obsidian casi se arruina tras Pillars of Eternity 2.

Amor_Eterno

Marquez total....

Son estudios que por si solos hace rato.... mucho rato no existirían...

Microsoft básicamente los ha apoyado para que sacaran varios juegos más, pero los veo graves, su próximo juego debe ser de una saga de masas, usarlos como apoyo de juegos más grandes o su destino está escrito.

Su próximo juego debe ser un fallout sea un spin off o un AAA grande apoyando a Bugthesda.

No hay más.

Artyom

Marquez De ahí solo New Vegas y Pillars 2 los consideraría buenos juegos. Y New Vegas salió como un pan sin meter en el horno y el segundo pasó completamente desapercibido. Quizas por la mediocridad de su antecesor. Mención especial a Tyranny que pese a ser buen juego se quedó un poco a medias (y no lo conoce nadie).

OscarPM

A mi me esta gustando.

« Página anterior Página siguiente »